Starting the Sonar Surveys - The Path to Discovery
March 27, 2000
By Dr. Dan Fornari
The sky early this morning was gray with
patches of puffy white clouds that became more peach colored
as the sun rose above the horizon. You will remember that yesterday,
we had electrical problems with the DSL-120 sonar and in the
evening, we had to bring it back on board to repair it. Bob Yogi Elder
and Craig Elder of the WHOI Deep Submergence Operations Group
spent all night working on it. Trouble-shooting equipment problems
at sea requires a combination of experience, making keen observations,
and luck! Bob and Craig noticed that a particular component
of the sonars electronics would shut off after working
just 6 minutes. They were able to trace the problem to a small
electronic component, called an integrated circuit (IC), that
costs just a few dollars. Even though the IC is small and cheap,
the DSL-120 sonar cannot ping without it. The problem was fixed
by early morning and at about 0800 hours, we again deployed
the sonar fish with the MAPRs mounted on the wire. Much to
everyones relief, we started collecting data just before
lunch.
Collecting
data is a big part of being a scientist, whether you are
a biologist working in the rain forest, a chemist working
in a laboratory, an astronomer trying to understand the universe,
or a marine geologist investigating the role that mid-ocean
ridge volcanoes play in causing seafloor spreading. Scientists
are trained to develop hypotheses, or ideas about how things
work, and then design experiments to collect the data needed
to test those ideas. On RV Melville, we are testing
the hypothesis that the seismic events recorded by the Autonomous
Hydrophone Array (AHA) are indicators of recent volcanic
eruptions on the East Pacific Rise axis.
Developing
hypotheses may sound easy, but how do scientists get the
money to conduct the experiments? It is a long process! Three
years ago, we (Dan, Maya, Mike, and our shore-based collaborators)
wrote a research proposal to the National Science Foundation
describing our hypothesis and presenting an experiment designed
to test it. Because NSF always tries to fund the best science
with the tax dollars that go towards supporting basic research,
they ask other scientists to review and comment on every
proposal. It took two years before NSF decided to fund the
proposal. It then took another year or so before a research
ship and the WHOI deep submergence vehicles were available
to do the surveys we had planned. After all this preparation,
it is no wonder that we are all anxious to see the mapping
systems working well and collecting data that will test our
hypothesis.
During the four-year wait, we collected more AHA data and learned more about
earthquake activity on the East Pacific Rise. Now that we are out at sea, with
the DSL-120 sonar system showing us images of the seafloor, we cant wait
for each new sonar record to come out of the printer. Will we see what we predicted,
or something completely unexpected? Join us tomorrow to find out what our first
data have shown us, and what new things we are learning about seafloor eruptions
on the East Pacific Rise.
|